- Specification for Metropolitan Planning Agency which can Make a big Difference   click here to open paper content72 kb
by    Dawkins, Jeremy | jeremy.dawkins@uts.edu.au   click here to send an email to the auther(s) of this paper
Short Outline
If climate change and biodiversity loss lead to strong global and national responses how can a planning agency have maximum effect? Australian experience of failures and successes suggests less rhetoric and radically more expertise and independence.
This paper addresses the issues raised in Workshop 2 and in particular
subthemes 2.1 and 2.2. Copenhagen demonstrated that real change towards
sustainability requires whole-of-government, if not whole-of-world, action.
Planning agencies, while acting now, need to be strong and well prepared
for the time, in the near future, when economic and regulatory measures
fundamentally depart from business as usual.

The Australian experience is that planning agencies currently exaggerate
the effectiveness of measures to achieve, for instance, compact cities,
better public transport, energy efficiency in buildings and centres, etc.
This practice will probably retard effective responses to strong carbon
reduction measures when they come into force. To contribute maximally to
the shift towards sustainable, low carbon cities, planning agencies will
need to adopt far stronger policies while moderating the rhetoric.

The Australian experience is also that metropolitan strategies and policies
relating to ESD and climate change mitigation and adaptation have much
greater legitimacy when adopted or endorsed by independent expert planning
agencies than when adopted by ministers or governments. The two extremes
of a continuum between direct ministerial powers and independent
authorities are represented by the states of New South Wales and Western
Australia. Fifty years of institutional change, and recent planning
controversies, reinforce the finding that strong measures for making urban
regions more sustainable will require institutions seen to have independent

Concrete examples of successes and failures will be presented to illustrate
the above arguments.
planning agency metropolitan expertise independence effectiveness
click here to open paper content  Click to open the full paper as pdf document
click here to send an email to the auther(s) of this paper  Click to send an email to the author(s) of this paper